The undergrad society took down one of my three posters. It was deemed the images were offensive to women. I had a cover of playboy and a cover of “best lesbian erotica” side by side with the caption “Representations of Sexualty, Desire, and Women’s Bodies: Does the intended audience make a difference?”
The undergrad society didn’t phone me first but they emailed me afterwards to let me know. The conflicting message from them was this - the content was fine, the image was deemed offensive. They also noted that an undergrad group had tried to advertise a beer party using images of women in skimpy bathing suits. Students had complained these posters were offensive (given some of the ads I’ve seen, I don’t doubt this - there are some extremely troubling use of words like “Whores” to sell events). So the reasoning goes if they do it to them, they must do it to me.
I asked if anyone complained about my poster. Nope. But I had a woman in a bathing suit and they used pictures of women in bathing suits so the same rule has to apply.
I clarified, then, that any picture of a woman in a bathing suit was offensive.
Well… no.
So what criteria was used? They just decided, is all.
I suggested that might not be the best policy.
This whole thing both made me laugh and kinda get pissed. All in all, I have used it to prep my lecture for Tuesday’s class. A friend pointed out that I need to make a poster with a cover of Fitness or Shape magazine and see what happens. I think I can post the poster here: wmst-posteredit.doc
Compare to Shape or Fitness:


Now, I’m not saying that we can’t have a discussion about what images are disturbing or sexist, etc… But I really do worry when it is repeated to me over and over that the content (written) was fine, but the images “if taken out of context are offensive”. First, context is everything. Second, Playboy covers are actually viewable in most settings, Third, we’re in uni people!
“What if they just looked at your poster and didn’t read anything - what would they think?” –> they would think they were viewing any of the millions of images we’re given daily about women on the covers of all magazines and billboards and tv. They’d then wonder why it was next to a picture of two women who obviously loved each other and who were not performing for men. They would then lean closer and read the text to find out what was going on. They would then maybe think to themselves, hmm does it matter if the images are produced for heterosexual male consumption as opposed to lesbian consumption? And then, my friends, my work would be for good. People would have thought about things.